MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

NADA Mounts Opposition to Enhanced Safeguards Rule

National Automobile Dealers Association officials have told the FTC that proposed new provisions to the Safeguards Rule may be unnecessary and could cost smaller dealers more than $400,000 in the first calendar year of enforcement.

Tariq Kamal
Tariq KamalFormer Associate Publisher
Read Tariq's Posts
September 9, 2019
NADA Mounts Opposition to Enhanced Safeguards Rule

NADA was among the entities that submitted official comments to Regulation.gov in response to potentially costly additions to the federal Safeguards Rule.

Credit:

Photo by Aberro Creative via Pixabay

3 min to read


TYSONS, Va. — National Automobile Dealers Association officials are on the record in opposition to proposed revisions to the federal Safeguards Rule. The new guidelines were offered by the Federal Trade Commission as a mechanism to enforce existing data privacy standards as new technologies and applications proliferate. NADA says they would represent an undue financial burden to auto dealers and could derail compliance efforts.

In effect since 2003, the rule affects “financial institutions,” including dealers whose activities include facilitating the financing and leasing of vehicles. It requires business owners to designate a compliance officer, identify risks and design appropriate safeguards, conduct risk assessments on software and oversee service providers, and periodically review their programs.

In addition to adding businesses “engaged in activities … incidental to financial activities” to its scope of enforcement, the government’s proposed changes would include provisions designed to “provide … more guidance” and “improve accountability” related to those efforts.

Writing for the August issue of F&I and Showroom, attorney and compliance expert Jim Ganther said that translates to the hiring or appointment of a chief information security officer.

Read: The Price of Compliance Is Going Up. Sorry.

“Designating an employee isn’t necessarily hard. But actually having a qualified employee already on the payroll may prove to be problematical,” Ganther wrote. “In the alternative, the CISO may be an outside service provider, but a senior manager at the dealership must oversee that service provider and the service provider must run an information security program that satisfies the FTC’s rule.”

The cost of a CISO alone would be “a tall order” for a small dealer, Ganther added.

“According to people in the computer security industry I’ve spoken to, $100,000 to $150,000 is a reasonable range. … The other option is to hire an outside contractor to perform the CISO duties. These people do not come cheap. My sources say one can expect to pay $4,000 to $10,000 per month for such services.”

Officials calculated a total average initial cost of $220,400 and ongoing annual costs of $217,800 for small dealers.

The association made its case in comments submitted to Regulations.gov last month. Officials calculated a total average initial cost of $220,400 and ongoing annual costs of $217,800 for small dealers. For midsize dealers, those costs grow to a projected average of $367,550 initially and $336,050 per year. Both sets of cost would be incurred in the first calendar year.

“Indeed, many financial institutions, like the vast majority of automobile dealers, are small businesses, with limited staffing, resources, and expertise that must be carefully, strategically, and appropriately deployed to meet the reasonableness standard of the rule and adequately protect consumer data,” officials wrote. “Our members range from large, publicly traded dealership groups with thousands of employees to small, single-store dealerships with as few as 10–15 employees.

“Most of our members are small businesses as defined by the Small Business Administration. Nevertheless, our members take great care and make substantial investments in money and time to protect the information they obtain and maintain — not just to comply with the rule, but also because they care about their customers and want to maintain the trust their customers have placed in them,” they added.

“The numbers are staggering, even if we’re off by 10 or 20 percent.”

The FTC’s official comment period was extended several times in response to requests from various entities, including NADA and the National Independent Automobile Dealers Association, and is now closed. There is no set timetable for review or further discussion of the new provisions or their monetary implications.

NADA President Peter Welch described the association’s calculations as “conservative.”

“The numbers are staggering, even if we’re off by 10 or 20 percent,” Welch told Automotive News. “It puts a squeeze particularly on our smaller dealers.”

Read: NADA 2019: Dealers Need New Identities

More Compliance

F&INovember 10, 2025

Singing a Gospel Song Backward

Crime and punishment in auto retail and how to avoid them

Read More →
ComplianceOctober 6, 2025

The Jurisprudence of Pricing

Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.

Read More →
ComplianceSeptember 15, 2025

Fines of the Times

Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Digitalby Hannah MitchellSeptember 5, 2025

Cyber Threats Continue Apace

Hackers, seeing auto retail vulnerabilities in 2024 CDK incident, are taking advantage, data show.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 11, 2025

Your Synthetic ID Theft Policy

Frankenstein’s monster is coming for your dealership. Use this guide to recognize synthetic ID thieves and maintain Red Flags Rule compliance.

Read More →
IndustryJuly 17, 2025

Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities

The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceJune 30, 2025

The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back

President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law

Read More →
IndustryJune 26, 2025

How to Clear a Red Flag

Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.

Read More →
Computer screen showing the Audit F&I Review Dashboard, displaying dealership selection and manager scorecard options for ABC Dealership.
F&Iby Press ReleaseJune 18, 2025

Mosaic Adds Continuous Monitoring With AuditF&I

New AuditF&I platform is designed to give dealerships a smarter way to stay compliant.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
DigitalJune 9, 2025

The Real ID Deadline

Challenges auto dealers may still face verifying identities

Read More →